This strikes me as an excellent example of ignoring the opponent's threat, making the move you really want to play work. It also shows the acute feeling strong players have for the importance of piece activity relative to material.
In the Petrosian-Botvinnik game I mentioned last time, I really enjoyed some of Petrosian's aggressive moves that a cursory examination of forcing moves (checks, captures, and threats) wouldn't necessarily catch.
I wanted to share news of a very interesting new book: "Modern Chess: From Steinitz to the 21st Century" by International Master Craig Pritchett. This Thinkers Publishing title is exactly what it sounds like, and has something for chess enthusiasts of all levels: Some history, some culture, some famous games we ought to have seen but maybe haven't, some instruction.
I wanted to offer another position that could be profitably solved by both newer and club level young tournament players. I got the position from the new book, "Tata Steel Chess Tournament 2021", by Grandmaster Daniel Fernandez.
Kids are very used to solving tactics, so they often attempt to treat instructive positions as if they were simple tactical exercises: "Takes, takes, bang". But real life doesn't work that way! Your opponent also has the right to exist, and will try to fight against your ideas. Anybody suggesting the sequence starting with 1.Qxd3?? is playing what the famous teacher Dan Heisman calls "hope chess" - making a move and hoping it works.